Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco vs Vache à boire myrtilles sauvages
Overall, Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco
Vache à boire myrtilles sauvages
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Yaourt à boire YOP parfum co... | Vache à boire myrtilles sauv... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 10.6 g | 9.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco has 38% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Vache à boire myrtilles sauvages has 11% less sugar (9.4 g vs 10.6 g).
- Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco has 17% more protein (3 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco
LAIT écrémé à base de poudre de LAIT - Sucre 7,9% - CREME – Arôme naturel – Concentré des minéraux du LAIT – Ferments LACTIQUES (LAIT) – Vitamine D. LAIT D'ORIGINE FRANCE.
Vache à boire myrtilles sauvages
Yaourt au lait entier (lait entier, protéines de lait, ferments lactiques), fruits 10% ( myrtilles 8,2%, cassis 1,8%, jus de citron concentré), sucre 7,1%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco or Vache à boire myrtilles sauvages?
Overall, Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Yaourt à boire YOP parfum coco has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vache à boire myrtilles sauvages has less sugar: 9.4 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.