Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade vs Power Carb 1:08 Sour Cherry
Overall, Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade
Power Carb 1:08 Sour Cherry
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Va... | Power Carb 1:08 Sour Cherry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 386 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 46.9 g |
| Salt | 4.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade has 92% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade has no sugar, while Power Carb 1:08 Sour Cherry has 46.9 g.
- Power Carb 1:08 Sour Cherry has 76% less salt (1 g vs 4.1 g).
Ingredients
Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade
Citric Acid, Natural & Artificial Flavors, Malic Acid, Acesulfame Potassium, Sucralose, Silicon Dioxide, FD&C Blue Lake #1
Power Carb 1:08 Sour Cherry
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade or Power Carb 1:08 Sour Cherry?
Overall, Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Xtend, Refreshing Apple & Vasocharge, Refreshing Lemonade has less sugar: 0 g versus 46.9 g per 100 g.