Comparison

Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey vs Tennessee Whiskey

Overall, Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWhisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Te...Tennessee Whiskey
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 0 kcal 392 kcal
Fat 0 g 15 g
Saturated fat 0 g 9 g
Sugars 0 g 61.2 g
Salt — 0 g
Protein 0 g 1.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has no calories, while Tennessee Whiskey has 392 kcal.
  • Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has no fat, while Tennessee Whiskey has 15 g.
  • Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has no saturated fat, while Tennessee Whiskey has 9 g.
  • Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has no sugar, while Tennessee Whiskey has 61.2 g.
  • Tennessee Whiskey has 100% more protein (1.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Tennessee Whiskey lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey

Not available.

Tennessee Whiskey

Zucker, Kakaomasse, Jack Daniel's® Tennessee Whiskey 11.5%, Kakaobutter, Kakaopulver, Butterreinfett, natürliches Vanille-Aroma, Emulgator (Sojalecithin). Kakao: 50% min. in der Schokolade. Kann Hazelnüsse, Mandeln, Gluten enthalten.x

FAQ

Which is healthier: Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey or Tennessee Whiskey?

Overall, Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Whisky 40% Jack Daniel‘s Tennessee Whiskey has less sugar: 0 g versus 61.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons