Comparison

Werther's Original Popcorn Classic Caramel vs Naked Oven Chips

Overall, Naked Oven Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWerther's Original Popcorn C...Naked Oven Chips
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 456 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 16.1 g 2.9 g
Saturated fat 10.2 g 0.3 g
Sugars 53.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.8 g 2.3 g
Protein 2.9 g 2.1 g
Additives10
AllergensMilk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Naked Oven Chips has 72% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 456 kcal).
  • Naked Oven Chips has 82% less fat (2.9 g vs 16.1 g).
  • Naked Oven Chips has 97% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 10.2 g).
  • Naked Oven Chips has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 53.2 g).
  • Naked Oven Chips has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Naked Oven Chips has 23% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Werther's Original Popcorn Classic Caramel has 28% more protein (2.9 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Naked Oven Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Naked Oven Chips is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Werther's Original Popcorn Classic Caramel lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Werther's Original Popcorn Classic Caramel

sugar, corn, glucose syrup, butterfat, cream 6,7%, condensed sweet whey, butter, salt, cane sugar syrup, sunflower oil, emulsifier lecithins (soy), aroma,

Naked Oven Chips

potatoes (97%), sunflower oil (3%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Werther's Original Popcorn Classic Caramel or Naked Oven Chips?

Overall, Naked Oven Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Naked Oven Chips has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 456 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Naked Oven Chips has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 53.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons