Comparison
Weissbier vs Pilsner Urquell
Overall, Pilsner Urquell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weissbier | Pilsner Urquell |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Ječné |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pilsner Urquell has no fat, while Weissbier has 0.5 g.
- Pilsner Urquell has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Only Pilsner Urquell lists: Ječné.
Ingredients
Weissbier
Water, WHEAT MALT, BARLEY MALT, hops, yeast
Pilsner Urquell
WASSER, GERSTENMALZ, HOPFEN HOPFENAUSZÜGE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weissbier or Pilsner Urquell?
Overall, Pilsner Urquell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pilsner Urquell has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pilsner Urquell has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.