Weinbrand Bohnen vs Marc de champagne
Overall, Weinbrand Bohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weinbrand Bohnen | Marc de champagne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 453 kcal | 488 kcal |
| Fat | 18.2 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.5 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 49.8 g | 50 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weinbrand Bohnen has 30% less fat (18.2 g vs 26 g).
- Weinbrand Bohnen has 28% less saturated fat (11.5 g vs 16 g).
- Weinbrand Bohnen has 100% more fiber (4.1 g vs 0 g).
- Marc de champagne has 43% more protein (4.7 g vs 2.7 g).
- Only Marc de champagne lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Weinbrand Bohnen
Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Zucker, Kakaomasse, 16% Weinbrand, Kakaobutter', Laktose, Vollmilchpulver, Emulgator: Lecithine. Das Produkt kann Spuren von Gluten, Erdnüssen, Soja, Hühnerei und Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
Marc de champagne
Захар, инвертен захарен сироп, какаово масло, какаова масло, пьлномаслено мляко на прах, Марк Де Шампейн (7%), обезмаслено мляко на прах, дехидратирана млечна мазнина, лактоза, вода, емулгатор (cоев лецитин), ечемичен малцов екстракт, естествен ароматизант, aроматизанти.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weinbrand Bohnen or Marc de champagne?
Overall, Weinbrand Bohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Weinbrand Bohnen has fewer calories: 453 kcal versus 488 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weinbrand Bohnen has less sugar: 49.8 g versus 50 g per 100 g.