Viva source de 16 vitamines vs Mellanmjölk med längre hållbarhet
Overall, Viva source de 16 vitamines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Viva source de 16 vitamines
Mellanmjölk med längre hållbarhet
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Viva source de 16 vitamines | Mellanmjölk med längre hållb... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viva source de 16 vitamines has 13% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Viva source de 16 vitamines has 33% less fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Viva source de 16 vitamines has 40% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Viva source de 16 vitamines
_lait_ à 1% de matières grasses, lactase, vitamines A, B1, B2, B5, B6, B8, B9, B12, E, PP et D.
Mellanmjölk med längre hållbarhet
Högpastöriserad _mjölk_, vitamin D,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Viva source de 16 vitamines or Mellanmjölk med längre hållbarhet?
Overall, Viva source de 16 vitamines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viva source de 16 vitamines has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mellanmjölk med längre hållbarhet has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.