Vitamin D3 für kinder vs Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3
Overall, Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vitamin D3 für kinder | Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vit... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 399 kcal | 8 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has 98% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 399 kcal).
- Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has no fat, while Vitamin D3 für kinder has 1.9 g.
- Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has no saturated fat, while Vitamin D3 für kinder has 1.9 g.
- Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has no sugar, while Vitamin D3 für kinder has 0.5 g.
- Vitamin D3 für kinder has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Vitamin D3 für kinder
Not available.
Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3
Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Säureregulator: Natriumcarbonat; Vitamin C, Inulin, Maisstärke, Süßungsmittel: Natriumcyclamat, Aroma Zitrone, Zinkgluconat, Aroma Limette, Süßungsmittel: Saccharin Natrium; Vitamin D, Farbstoff: Riboflavine, Natriumselenat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vitamin D3 für kinder or Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3?
Overall, Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vitamin C + Zink, Selen, Vitamin D3 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.