Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco vs Néctar de Piña y Coco
Overall, Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco | Néctar de Piña y Coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 11.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has 62% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Néctar de Piña y Coco has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has 61% less sugar (4.4 g vs 11.3 g).
- Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has 60% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.2 g).
- Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco
Água, sumos de ananás (46%) e coco (4%): à base de concentrados, regulador de acidez: ácido cítrico, antioxidante: ácido ascórbico e edulcorante: glicosídeos de esteviol. Baixas calorias. Teor de frutos: no mínimo 50%.
Néctar de Piña y Coco
Agua, zumo de piña a partir de concentrado (3949), sausain tad (16%) zica, leche de coco (196), regulador de la acidez: ácido citrico, estabilizante: pectina, antioxidante: ácido ascórbico y aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco or Néctar de Piña y Coco?
Overall, Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vital Equilíbrio Ananás Coco has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 11.3 g per 100 g.