Comparison

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio vs Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena

Overall, Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVinaigre balsamique de Modèn...Crema Aceto Balsamico di Mod...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 118 kcal 195 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 25 g 41 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 1.1 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.9 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio has 40% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 195 kcal).
  • Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio has 39% less sugar (25 g vs 41 g).
  • Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena has 44% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio

Vinaigre de vin*, moût de raisin cuit*. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique. Processus biologique contrôlé par IT-BIO-007.

Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena

gekochter Traubenmost, Aceto Balsamico Modena IGP 38% (Weinessig, konzentrierter Traubenmost, gekochter Traubenmost, Farbstoff: E 150d), Feinessig Farbstoff: E 150d, modifizierte Maisstärke, Verdickungsmittel: Xanthan.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio or Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena?

Overall, Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène bio has less sugar: 25 g versus 41 g per 100 g.

More comparisons