Comparison
Vin rouge biologique IGP des Cévennes (fontaine de 5 L) Les Sources vs Bio-Zweigelt
Overall, Bio-Zweigelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Vin rouge biologique IGP des Cévennes (fontaine de 5 L) Les Sources
Les Sources · 5 L
Better choice 
Bio-Zweigelt
Flat Lake · 0,75 L
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Vin rouge biologique IGP des... | Bio-Zweigelt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Zweigelt has 45% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 11 kcal).
- Bio-Zweigelt has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Only Bio-Zweigelt lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Vin rouge biologique IGP des Cévennes (fontaine de 5 L) Les Sources
Vin rouge biologique IGP des Cévennes
Bio-Zweigelt
Trauben, Zucker, rektifiziertes Traubenmostkonzentrat, Antioxidationsmittel (Schwefeldioxid).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vin rouge biologique IGP des Cévennes (fontaine de 5 L) Les Sources or Bio-Zweigelt?
Overall, Bio-Zweigelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio-Zweigelt has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Zweigelt has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.