Vimto Cordial 1L vs Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ
Overall, Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Vimto Cordial 1L | Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS F... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Barley Malt | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ has 47% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 19 kcal).
- Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ has 53% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.7 g).
- Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Vimto Cordial 1L lists: Gluten, Barley Malt.
Ingredients
Vimto Cordial 1L
Water, Sugar, Mixed Fruit Juices From Concentrate 10% (Grape, Blackcurrant, Raspberry), Acid (Citric Acid), Vimto Flavouring (Including Natural Extracts of Fruits, Herbs, _Barley Malt_ and Spices), Vegetable and Plant Extracts, Acidity Regulator (Sodium Citrate), Preservatives (Sodium Benzoate, Potassium Sorbate), Vitamin C, Sweeteners (Sucralose, Acesulfame K)
Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ
Eau gazéifiée 91,6%. jus de citron à base de concentré 5%, sucre liquide, arôme naturel, sel. arôme naturel de citron.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vimto Cordial 1L or Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ?
Overall, Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maison Perrier Chic CITRUS FIZZ has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.