Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat vs Torronaire d'agramunt
Overall, Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat | Torronaire d'agramunt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 471 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 30 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 6.5 g |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Nuts | Eggs, Nuts, ALMENDRA, HUEVO |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has 58% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 471 kcal).
- Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has 33% less fat (14 g vs 21 g).
- Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has 71% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 3.8 g).
- Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has 60% less sugar (12 g vs 30 g).
- Torronaire d'agramunt has 62% more fiber (6.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Torronaire d'agramunt has 67% more protein (15 g vs 4.9 g).
- Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Torronaire d'agramunt lists: ALMENDRA, HUEVO.
Ingredients
Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat
Almond, Sugar, Glucose Syrup, Honey, Egg White.
Torronaire d'agramunt
ALMENDRA (64%), jarabe de glucosa fructosa, azúcar, miel, clara de HUEVO y oblea (fécula de patata). Puede contener trazas de otros FRUTOS DE CASCARA y productos LÁCTEOS
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat or Torronaire d'agramunt?
Overall, Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 471 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vicens, Hard Almond Nougat has less sugar: 12 g versus 30 g per 100 g.