Comparison
Underberg Bio 3er-Pack vs Orange 20%
Overall, Underberg Bio 3er-Pack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Underberg Bio 3er-Pack | Orange 20% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 48 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Underberg Bio 3er-Pack has 94% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 48 kcal).
- Underberg Bio 3er-Pack has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Underberg Bio 3er-Pack
Not available.
Orange 20%
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Underberg Bio 3er-Pack or Orange 20%?
Overall, Underberg Bio 3er-Pack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Underberg Bio 3er-Pack has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 48 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Underberg Bio 3er-Pack has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 12 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Ramazotti Kräuter Likör vs Orange 20%
Underberg 12er-Pack vs Orange 20%
Underberg 12er-Pack vs Underberg Bio 3er-Pack
Underberg Bio 3er-Pack vs Amaro Averna
Amaro Averna vs Orange 20%
Licor de hierbas vs Orange 20%
Waldkrauter liqueur aux... vs Underberg Bio 3er-Pack
Waldkrauter liqueur aux... vs Orange 20%