Comparison

Typ Cappuccino classic vs Cappuccino

Overall, Typ Cappuccino classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTyp Cappuccino classicCappuccino
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 41 kcal 401 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 4.7 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 4.3 g
Sugars 5.4 g 63 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 3.1 g
Protein 0.8 g 5.6 g
Additives34
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Typ Cappuccino classic has 90% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 401 kcal).
  • Typ Cappuccino classic has 83% less fat (0.8 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Typ Cappuccino classic has 84% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Typ Cappuccino classic has 91% less sugar (5.4 g vs 63 g).
  • Typ Cappuccino classic has 89% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Cappuccino has 86% more protein (5.6 g vs 0.8 g).

Ingredients

Typ Cappuccino classic

Süßmolkenpulver, Zucker, Glukosesirup, löslicher Bohnenkaffee¹ 14%, Kokosfett, Magermilchpulver 5,6%, Molkenpermeatpulver, Speisesalz, Stabilisator (Kaliumphosphate),Säureregulator (Kaliumcarbonate), Emulgator (Diacetylweinsäureester von Mono - und Diglyceriden von Speisefettsäuren), Maltodextrin.

Cappuccino

Azúcar, café soluble 14%, _lactosa_, jarabe de glucosa, grasa de coco, _leche_ desnatada en polvo, suero _lácteo_ en polvo, corrector de acidez (E500ii), sal, proteínas _lácteas_, minerales de la _leche_, estabilizantes (E339ii, E451), aroma natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Typ Cappuccino classic or Cappuccino?

Overall, Typ Cappuccino classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Typ Cappuccino classic has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 401 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Typ Cappuccino classic has less sugar: 5.4 g versus 63 g per 100 g.

More comparisons