Twin snakes vs Biona Organic Sour Snakes
Overall, Twin snakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Twin snakes | Biona Organic Sour Snakes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 42.3 g | 56 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Apple |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Twin snakes has 24% less sugar (42.3 g vs 56 g).
- Twin snakes has 96% more protein (7.7 g vs 0.3 g).
- Twin snakes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Biona Organic Sour Snakes lists: Apple.
Ingredients
Twin snakes
Not available.
Biona Organic Sour Snakes
glucose syrup, sugar, gelling agent (Pectin), Acid (Malic acid, citric acid), Acidity regulator (Socium citrates), natural lemon flavouring, natural strawberry flavouring, natural orange flavouring, natural currant flavouring, Natual apple flavouring, natural turmeric flavouring, fruit concentrates ( strawberry, elderberry, apple), colouring algae extract (spirulina platensis).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Twin snakes or Biona Organic Sour Snakes?
Overall, Twin snakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Biona Organic Sour Snakes has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Twin snakes has less sugar: 42.3 g versus 56 g per 100 g.