Comparison

Turrón de maní vs Turrón & maní

Overall, Turrón & maní has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTurrón de maníTurrón & maní
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 438 kcal 320 kcal
Fat 16 g 8 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 1.2 g
Sugars 49 g 34.4 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.4 g 19.6 g
Protein 8.6 g 6.8 g
Additives15
AllergensEggs, Peanuts, SoybeansGluten, Peanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Turrón & maní has 27% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 438 kcal).
  • Turrón & maní has 50% less fat (8 g vs 16 g).
  • Turrón & maní has 59% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Turrón & maní has 30% less sugar (34.4 g vs 49 g).
  • Turrón & maní has 88% more fiber (19.6 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Turrón de maní has 21% more protein (8.6 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Turrón & maní has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Turrón de maní lists: Eggs.
  • Only Turrón & maní lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Turrón de maní

Azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, maní tostado 30%, aceite de soja interesterificado, albúmina de huevo, espesante: gelatina, aromatizantes artificiales

Turrón & maní

Jarabe de isomalto oligosacáridos, harina de trigo enriquecida (hierro, acido fólico, tiamina, riboflavina, niacina), cacahuate tostado, aceite de girasol, proteína vegetal hidrolizada, sal, emulsionante: lecitina de soja, espesante: gelatina/grenetina bovina, leudante: bicarbonato de sodio, aroma artificial

FAQ

Which is healthier: Turrón de maní or Turrón & maní?

Overall, Turrón & maní has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Turrón & maní has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 438 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Turrón & maní has less sugar: 34.4 g versus 49 g per 100 g.

More comparisons