Comparison

Turrón de chocolate crujiente vs Turrón crujiente negro

Overall, Turrón de chocolate crujiente has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTurrón de chocolate crujient...Turrón crujiente negro
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 519 kcal 521 kcal
Fat 28 g 32 g
Saturated fat 11 g 16 g
Sugars 48 g 37 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.4 g 2.9 g
Protein 6.9 g 7.3 g
Additives21
AllergensMilk, NutsNuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Turrón de chocolate crujiente has 13% less fat (28 g vs 32 g).
  • Turrón de chocolate crujiente has 31% less saturated fat (11 g vs 16 g).
  • Turrón crujiente negro has 23% less sugar (37 g vs 48 g).
  • Turrón de chocolate crujiente has 14% more fiber (3.4 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Only Turrón de chocolate crujiente lists: Milk.
  • Only Turrón crujiente negro lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Turrón de chocolate crujiente

Azúcar, pasta de frutos de cáscara (_avellana_, _almendra_), manteca de cacao, cereales crujientes 12% (harina de arroz, harina de maíz, azúcar, sal), pasta de cacao, _leche_ descremada en polvo, materia grasa _láctea_ anhidra, emulgentes (lecitinas, E476), aromas.

Turrón crujiente negro

azúcar, pasta de cacao, manteca de cacao, pasta de _avellana_, cacao desgrasado en polvo, arroz inflado (5%), emulgente (lecitinas (contiene _soja_)) y aroma,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Turrón de chocolate crujiente or Turrón crujiente negro?

Overall, Turrón de chocolate crujiente has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Turrón de chocolate crujiente has fewer calories: 519 kcal versus 521 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Turrón crujiente negro has less sugar: 37 g versus 48 g per 100 g.

More comparisons