Comparison

Tripes à la mode de Caen vs Tripes à la mode de Caen

Overall, Tripes à la mode de Caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTripes à la mode de CaenTripes à la mode de Caen
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 81 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 1 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 0.7 g
Protein 14 g 20 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes à la mode de Caen has 21% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 103 kcal).
  • Tripes à la mode de Caen has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Tripes à la mode de Caen has 30% more protein (20 g vs 14 g).
  • Tripes à la mode de Caen has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tripes à la mode de Caen

Tripes de bovins 53% (panses, bonnets, feuillets, caillettes de bovins en proportions naturelles), eau, pieds de bovins désossés 6%, oignons 6%, carottes 6%, Calvados 1%, sel, épices, plantes aromatiques, arôme naturel, colorant: caramel ordinaire. Traces éventuelles de céleri.

Tripes à la mode de Caen

Estomacs* et pieds de bœuf * 73,1%, eau*, carottes* 3,5%, vin aromatisé, oignons* 1%, Calvados* 0,8%, jus concentré de citron, sel, poireaux* 0,4%, maltodextrine, piment doux, extraits d'épices et de plantes aromatiques (poivre, laurier, girofle, thym, piment), ail.* Ingrédients d'origine française.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes à la mode de Caen or Tripes à la mode de Caen?

Overall, Tripes à la mode de Caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes à la mode de Caen has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tripes à la mode de Caen has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons