Trinkschokolade vs Latte Max con cioccolato
Overall, Trinkschokolade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Trinkschokolade | Latte Max con cioccolato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 89 kcal | 75 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 8.7 g | 11.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Latte Max con cioccolato has 16% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 89 kcal).
- Latte Max con cioccolato has 56% less fat (1.8 g vs 4.1 g).
- Latte Max con cioccolato has 54% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Trinkschokolade has 22% less sugar (8.7 g vs 11.1 g).
- Trinkschokolade has 16% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.2 g).
- Trinkschokolade has the better Nutri-Score.
- Trinkschokolade is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Trinkschokolade lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Trinkschokolade
_Vollmilch_, Zucker, 2,1% Schokoladenpulver (Zucker, Kakao), 0,7 % fettarmer Kakao.
Latte Max con cioccolato
Ingredienti: latte parzialmente scremato (91.5%), zucchero 6%), cioccolato (1%), cacao (0.5%), stablizzanti: E460, E466, E407; concentrato di minerali del latte, ioduro di potassio, vitamine: D, E, K, tiamina (B1), riboflavina (B2), niacina (PP), B6, acido folico (B9), biotina (B8).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trinkschokolade or Latte Max con cioccolato?
Overall, Trinkschokolade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Latte Max con cioccolato has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trinkschokolade has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 11.1 g per 100 g.