Traubensaft vs Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink
Overall, Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Traubensaft | Red Grape Sparkling Juice Dr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink has 69% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 67 kcal).
- Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink has 70% less sugar (4.8 g vs 16 g).
- Traubensaft has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink has the better Nutri-Score.
- Traubensaft is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Traubensaft
Traubensaft
Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink
Carbonated water, Grape juices from concentrate (40%), Malic acid, Natural flavourings, Citric acid. Sweetener: Steviol glycosides (Stevia leaf extract).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Traubensaft or Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink?
Overall, Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Grape Sparkling Juice Drink has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 16 g per 100 g.