Traubensaft vs Traubensaft rot
Overall, Traubensaft rot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Traubensaft | Traubensaft rot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 68 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 16.3 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Traubensaft rot has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Traubensaft
Traubensaft
Traubensaft rot
100% Traubensaft rot
FAQ
Which is healthier: Traubensaft or Traubensaft rot?
Overall, Traubensaft rot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Traubensaft has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Traubensaft has less sugar: 16.3 g versus 18 g per 100 g.