Comparison

Tonica zero freeway vs Fanta Exotic

Overall, Tonica zero freeway has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientTonica zero freewayFanta Exotic
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 2 kcal 3 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tonica zero freeway has no sugar, while Fanta Exotic has 0.4 g.
  • Tonica zero freeway has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tonica zero freeway

Not available.

Fanta Exotic

Kolsyrat vatten, juice från koncentrat syra (E330), citrusextrakt, frukt - och vegetabiliskt koncentrat (aronia, morot, fläderbär, färgtistel, citron, svartvinbär), sötningsmedel (aspartam, acesulfam K), surhetsreglerande medel (E331), konserveringsmedel (E202), naturliga aromer, stabiliseringsmedel (E412). Innehåller en källa till fenylalanin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tonica zero freeway or Fanta Exotic?

Overall, Tonica zero freeway has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tonica zero freeway has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 3 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tonica zero freeway has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons