Tomme des pyrenees igp coupe vs TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS
Overall, TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tomme des pyrenees igp coupe
TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomme des pyrenees igp coupe | TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G m... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS has 10% less fat (27 g vs 30 g).
- TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS has no sugar, while Tomme des pyrenees igp coupe has 0.5 g.
- Tomme des pyrenees igp coupe has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Tomme des pyrenees igp coupe
Lait pasteurisé de vache [Origine : France) ; ; sel ; ; présure ; ; ferments lactiques (dont lait); ; colorants de la croûte : E153, E160b (ii) ; ; conservateur de la croûte : E235.
TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS
Lait de vache pasteurisé (origine : France), sel, ferments lactiques (dont lait),enzyme coagulante.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomme des pyrenees igp coupe or TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS?
Overall, TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
TOMME DE DOMESSIN 1/6 300G massif LS has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.