Comparison

Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g vs Tomme de Brebis

Overall, Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomme de brebis lait pasteur...Tomme de Brebis
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 416 kcal 413 kcal
Fat 36 g 36 g
Saturated fat 23 g 26 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 23 g 22 g
Additives05
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g has 12% less saturated fat (23 g vs 26 g).
  • Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g has no sugar, while Tomme de Brebis has 0.5 g.
  • Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g

Lait de brebis pasteurisé* (Origine : France), sel, ferments lactiques (lait), présure, chlorure de calcium. *Ingrédient issu de l agriculture biologique

Tomme de Brebis

_Lait_ de brebis pasteurisé, sel, coagulant, ferments _lactiques._ Lait origine France Ne pas consommer la croûte. Composition de la croûte : PVA, colorant E150a, conservateurs : E235 et E202, sulfate de calcium E516, gomme de xanthane E415, acide citrique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g or Tomme de Brebis?

Overall, Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomme de Brebis has fewer calories: 413 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tomme de brebis lait pasteurisé 36%mg, 160g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons