Terrine de sanglier vs Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac
Overall, Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Terrine de sanglier | Terrine de Sanglier au Cogna... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has 21% fewer calories (301 kcal vs 383 kcal).
- Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has 27% less fat (27 g vs 37 g).
- Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has 29% less saturated fat (9.9 g vs 14 g).
- Terrine de sanglier has 22% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Terrine de sanglier has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Terrine de sanglier is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Terrine de sanglier
Gras de porc, foie de porc, viande de sanglier 20 %, gorge de porc, épices, muscade, poivre,
Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac
Gorge de porc, viande de sanglier 21 %, foie de volaille, LAIT, OEUFS, sel, Cognac 0,8 %, épices, arômes naturels.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terrine de sanglier or Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac?
Overall, Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has fewer calories: 301 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine de Sanglier au Cognac has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.