Terrine de Cerf au Cognac vs Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac
Overall, Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Terrine de Cerf au Cognac | Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 283 kcal | 313 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.4 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
- Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Terrine de Cerf au Cognac lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Terrine de Cerf au Cognac
Gorge de porc, viande de cerf 21%, foie de volaille, lait, oeufs, sel, cognac 1%, &pices, arômes naturels
Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac
Viande de cerf (25%), gras de porc, gorge de porc, foie de porc, maigre de porc, Armagnac (2%), sel, épices. Viande origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terrine de Cerf au Cognac or Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac?
Overall, Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine de Cerf au Cognac has fewer calories: 283 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.