Comparison

Terrine de Cerf au Cognac vs Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac

Overall, Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine de Cerf au CognacTerrine de cerf à l'Armagnac
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 317 kcal 254 kcal
Fat 28 g 22 g
Saturated fat 12 g 7.6 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.6 g
Fiber — 0.2 g
Protein 14 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has 20% fewer calories (254 kcal vs 317 kcal).
  • Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has 21% less fat (22 g vs 28 g).
  • Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has 37% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 12 g).
  • Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has no sugar, while Terrine de Cerf au Cognac has 0.9 g.
  • Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Terrine de Cerf au Cognac

Gras de porc*, viande de cerf 20% (origine: UE), foie de porc*, gorge de porc*, eau, couenne de porc*, amidon modifé de pomme de terre, se, épices et aromates, Cognac 1%, arôme, dextrose. *Origine France

Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac

Foie de volaille, gras de porc, viande de cerf 20%, couenne de porc, eau, vin rouge, _œuf_, sel, Armagnac 1%, arôme naturel, épices, plantes aromatiques

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine de Cerf au Cognac or Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac?

Overall, Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has fewer calories: 254 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine de cerf à l'Armagnac has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons