Comparison
Tequila Beer vs Corona extra
Overall, Corona extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tequila Beer | Corona extra |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Corona extra has 22% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Corona extra has no sugar, while Tequila Beer has 1.7 g.
- Only Corona extra lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Tequila Beer
Not available.
Corona extra
water, malted barley, corn, hops
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tequila Beer or Corona extra?
Overall, Corona extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Corona extra has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Corona extra has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.