Comparison

Taste of Thailand vs Sriracha

Overall, Taste of Thailand has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTaste of ThailandSriracha
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 112 kcal 139 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 21 g 22 g
Salt 4.4 g 7.2 g
Fiber 1.9 g 2.3 g
Protein 0.6 g 2.3 g
Additives55
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Taste of Thailand has 19% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 139 kcal).
  • Taste of Thailand has 50% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Taste of Thailand has 38% less salt (4.4 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Sriracha has 17% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Sriracha has 74% more protein (2.3 g vs 0.6 g).

Ingredients

Taste of Thailand

64% Pickled Red Chilli (Red Chilli, Salt, Acidity Regulator: Acetic Acid), Sugar, Water, Garlic, Salt, Modified Maize Starch, Acidity Regulators: Acetic Acid, Citric Acid; Yeast Extract, Preservative: Potassium Sorbate; Thickener. Xanthan Gum; Colour: Paprika Extract.

Sriracha

Siracha Chilisauce, scharf dtaten: Chli 61%, Zucker, Wasser, Salz, Knoblauch, GSChmacksverstärker: E621: Konservierungsstoft: E202. Srracha chili sauce, stærk SAUBrungsmittel: E260, E330: Stabilisator: E415; rgedienser: Chilil 61%, sukke vand, salt, hvidlog, sye: E20 EKS, stabilisator: E415; smagsforstærker: E621: Crseveringsmiddel: E202. sa de chili Sriracha, picante eal. ajo, acd gediertes 61%, azúcar, agua, sal, estabilizante: E415; potenciador des sabor: E621; Nadestens daltbar bis: siehe Flaschenhals. SServador. E202. ALA Raninen im Kühlschrank für Kinoel een WorhOewahren und innerhalb von ochen verbrauchen/ Beg t tor. 9 ska pbevares i koleskab efter ConSnerefter anvendes indentor e Dres preferentemente antes oel: SOn en la botella. Despuesocas le abrir 200 m1 ene la nevera y consumir en

FAQ

Which is healthier: Taste of Thailand or Sriracha?

Overall, Taste of Thailand has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Taste of Thailand has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Taste of Thailand has less sugar: 21 g versus 22 g per 100 g.

More comparisons