Tarama à la truffe noire 1% vs Tarama à la truffe d'été
Overall, Tarama à la truffe d'été has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Tarama à la truffe noire 1%
Tarama à la truffe d'été
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama à la truffe noire 1% | Tarama à la truffe d'été |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 530 kcal | 555 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 57 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 4.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tarama à la truffe d'été has 27% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 6.4 g).
- Tarama à la truffe d'été has no sugar, while Tarama à la truffe noire 1% has 0.5 g.
- Tarama à la truffe noire 1% has 17% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Tarama à la truffe noire 1% has 43% more protein (13 g vs 7.4 g).
- Tarama à la truffe d'été has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tarama à la truffe noire 1% lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Tarama à la truffe noire 1%
Huile de colza, œufs de CABILLAUD fumés 45% (œufs de CABILLAUD sel), chapelure (farine de BLE, levure, sel), truffe noire (tuber melanosporum) (truffe noire 1%, sel), crème (crème de LAIT, stabilisant : carraghénanes), arôme naturel de truffe (GLUTEN)
Tarama à la truffe d'été
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama à la truffe noire 1% or Tarama à la truffe d'été?
Overall, Tarama à la truffe d'été has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tarama à la truffe noire 1% has fewer calories: 530 kcal versus 555 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama à la truffe d'été has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.