Comparison
Taikayö vs Medovik Makovy
Overall, Medovik Makovy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Taikayö | Medovik Makovy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 399 kcal | 382 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 6.9 g |
| Sugars | 32 g | 29 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | — |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Medovik Makovy has 18% less fat (18 g vs 22 g).
- Medovik Makovy has 37% less saturated fat (6.9 g vs 11 g).
- Medovik Makovy has 55% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Medovik Makovy has 42% more protein (8.9 g vs 5.2 g).
Ingredients
Taikayö
Not available.
Medovik Makovy
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Taikayö or Medovik Makovy?
Overall, Medovik Makovy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Medovik Makovy has fewer calories: 382 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Medovik Makovy has less sugar: 29 g versus 32 g per 100 g.