Comparison
Tafelwasser Medium vs Eau de table
Overall, Eau de table has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tafelwasser Medium | Eau de table |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 9 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Eau de table has no calories, while Tafelwasser Medium has 9 kcal.
- Eau de table has no fat, while Tafelwasser Medium has 0.5 g.
- Eau de table has no sugar, while Tafelwasser Medium has 0.5 g.
- Tafelwasser Medium has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Eau de table has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tafelwasser Medium
Wasser, Kohlensäure, Natursole
Eau de table
Eau de Table
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tafelwasser Medium or Eau de table?
Overall, Eau de table has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Eau de table has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 9 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eau de table has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.