Sweet Easy Peelers vs Bio dinkelflocken
Overall, Bio dinkelflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet Easy Peelers | Bio dinkelflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 41 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 9.6 g | 9.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio dinkelflocken has 20% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Sweet Easy Peelers
Clementine treated with Imazalil/Thiabendazole/Pyrimethanil, 2,4 - D, wax E914, E904, E903.
Bio dinkelflocken
flocons d'épeautre.lngrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet Easy Peelers or Bio dinkelflocken?
Overall, Bio dinkelflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio dinkelflocken has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sweet Easy Peelers has less sugar: 9.6 g versus 9.6 g per 100 g.