Comparison
Suze vs Aperol
Overall, Suze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Suze | Aperol |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 56 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 14 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Suze has 78% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Suze has 44% less sugar (14 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
Suze
gentianes dont 50% de gentianes sauvages.
Aperol
APERITIF - APERITIF MIT ALKOHOL - APERITIF - APERITIVO - APERITIE APERITIF - BITTER MIT FARBSTOFF
FAQ
Which is healthier: Suze or Aperol?
Overall, Suze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Suze has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Suze has less sugar: 14 g versus 25 g per 100 g.