Sundae choco vs Myrtilles douces & sucrées
Overall, Myrtilles douces & sucrées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sundae choco | Myrtilles douces & sucrées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 54 g | 7.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | \ origin\ :[\ UE\\/Non UE\ ]}], |[{\ ingredient\ :\ Myrtille\ |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Myrtilles douces & sucrées has 81% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 318 kcal).
- Myrtilles douces & sucrées has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Myrtilles douces & sucrées has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Myrtilles douces & sucrées has 85% less sugar (7.9 g vs 54 g).
- Myrtilles douces & sucrées has 44% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Sundae choco has 45% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Myrtilles douces & sucrées has the better Nutri-Score.
- Myrtilles douces & sucrées is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Myrtilles douces & sucrées lists: \ origin\ :[\ UE\\/Non UE\ ]}], |[{\ ingredient\ :\ Myrtille\.
Ingredients
Sundae choco
sirop de glucose-fructose, chocolat en poudre 13% (sucre, cacao en poudre), eau, arôme
Myrtilles douces & sucrées
100% myrtilles.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sundae choco or Myrtilles douces & sucrées?
Overall, Myrtilles douces & sucrées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Myrtilles douces & sucrées has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Myrtilles douces & sucrées has less sugar: 7.9 g versus 54 g per 100 g.