Suissinhos vs Danonino
Overall, Danonino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Suissinhos | Danonino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 105 kcal | 94 kcal |
| Fat | 3.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 11.4 g | 10.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Danonino has 10% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 105 kcal).
- Danonino has 36% less fat (2.5 g vs 3.9 g).
- Danonino has 28% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Suissinhos has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Danonino has 17% more protein (6.3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Only Danonino lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Suissinhos
Not available.
Danonino
Fromage blanc au lait pasteurisé (81,9%), sucre (6,2% en moyenne), fruits (framboise (6,6%) ou fraise (6,2%) ou banane (6,2%) ou pêche-poire (5,6%) ou abricot (5,5%)), jus de framboise à base de concentré (dans variété framboise), épaississants (amidon transformé, gomme guar), jus d'abricot à base de concentré (dans variété abricot), citrates de calcium, arômes naturels, jus concentré de citron, jus concentré de sureau (dans variété framboise), concentré de carotte noire (dans variétés fraise et abricot), vitamine D. Lait: Origine France. Une portion contient 22% des AR* en Calcium et 30% des AR* en Vitamine D. 1 portion = 2 pots.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Suissinhos or Danonino?
Overall, Danonino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Danonino has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Danonino has less sugar: 10.7 g versus 11.4 g per 100 g.