Comparison

Sucre complet sachet pure canne bio daddy 500g vs Zucchero di canna integrale

Overall, Zucchero di canna integrale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSucre complet sachet pure ca...Zucchero di canna integrale
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — —
Calories 399 kcal 386 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 96.9 g 94 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.2 g 0 g
Protein 0.3 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Zucchero di canna integrale has 50% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.3 g).

Ingredients

Sucre complet sachet pure canne bio daddy 500g

Sucre complet Pure Canne issu de l'agriculture biologique

Zucchero di canna integrale

ZUCCHERO DI CANNA INTEGRALE biologico-organic Dichiarazione nutrizionale: valori medi per / Nutrition declaration per: Déclaration nutritionnelle pour: Nährwertdeklaration pro: /Voedingswaardevermelding voor:/ Información nutricional por Energia/Energy/Energie/Energie Energie/Valor energético Grassi Fat Graisses/Fett/Vetten/Grasas - di cui acidi grassi saturi/of which: saturates/ dont: acides gras saturés/davon: gesättigte Fettsäuren/waarvan: verzadigde vetzuren/ de las cuales: ácidos grasos saturados Carboidrati/Carbohydrate/Glucides/ Kohlenhydrate/Koolhydraten/Hidratos de carbono 100g kJ 1639 kcal 386 Og Og 96 g 94g -

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucre complet sachet pure canne bio daddy 500g or Zucchero di canna integrale?

Overall, Zucchero di canna integrale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zucchero di canna integrale has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Zucchero di canna integrale has less sugar: 94 g versus 96.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons