Studentenfutter Classic vs Studentenfutter mit Cranberries
Overall, Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Studentenfutter Classic
Studentenfutter mit Cranberries
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Studentenfutter Classic | Studentenfutter mit Cranberr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 514 kcal | 480 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 29.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 32 g | 29.8 g |
| Salt | 6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has 16% less fat (29.4 g vs 35 g).
- Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has 100% less salt (0 g vs 6 g).
- Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has 15% more protein (14.1 g vs 12 g).
- Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Studentenfutter mit Cranberries lists: Nuts, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Studentenfutter Classic
40 % Rosinen (Rosinen, Sonnenblumenöl), 20% Haselnusskerne, 15 % Walnusskerne, 10% blanchierte Mandeln, 10% Paranusskerne, 5% Cashewkerne
Studentenfutter mit Cranberries
40 % getrocknete und gezuckerte Cranberries (61 % Cranberries, Zucker, Sonnenblumenöl), 30 % geröstete Erdnusskerne, 10% Cashewkerne, 10% blanchierte Mandeln, 10% Walnusskerne.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Studentenfutter Classic or Studentenfutter mit Cranberries?
Overall, Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has fewer calories: 480 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Studentenfutter mit Cranberries has less sugar: 29.8 g versus 32 g per 100 g.