Comparison

Studentenfutter vs Studentenfutter

Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientStudentenfutterStudentenfutter
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 469 kcal 471 kcal
Fat 27 g 27 g
Saturated fat 18 g 3 g
Sugars 29 g 36.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 5.8 g 6.7 g
Protein 12 g 11.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsMilk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Studentenfutter has 83% less saturated fat (3 g vs 18 g).
  • Studentenfutter has 20% less sugar (29 g vs 36.1 g).
  • Studentenfutter has 13% more fiber (6.7 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Studentenfutter has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Studentenfutter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Studentenfutter lists: Milk, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Studentenfutter

Weinbeeren* geölt 30 % (Weinbeeren*, Sonnenblumenöl*), Sultaninen* geölt 20 % (Sultaninen*, Sonnenblumenöl*), MANDELN* weiß 15 %, HASELNUSSKERNE* 14 %, CASHEWNÜSSE* 14 %, WALNUSSKERNE* 7 % *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Erdnuss, anderen Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.

Studentenfutter

50% raisins, 13% blanched Almonds, 13% Almonds, 12% hazelnut kernel, 12% Chashew Kernel The product can contain Peanuts, Soy, Milk, Sellery, musrard, sesame or other nuts

FAQ

Which is healthier: Studentenfutter or Studentenfutter?

Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Studentenfutter has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 471 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Studentenfutter has less sugar: 29 g versus 36.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons