Studentenfutter vs Studentenfutter
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Studentenfutter | Studentenfutter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 483 kcal | 471 kcal |
| Fat | 27.6 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 34.4 g | 29 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Peanuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Studentenfutter has 37% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.8 g).
- Studentenfutter has 16% less sugar (29 g vs 34.4 g).
- Studentenfutter has 11% more fiber (6.5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Studentenfutter has 26% more protein (16.2 g vs 12 g).
- Only Studentenfutter lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Studentenfutter
Rosinen 45%, Erdnusskerne geröstet 30%, Cashewkerne 8%, Mandeln 8%, Mandeln blanchiert 8%, Sonnenblumenöl. Kann Spuren von anderen Schalenfrüchten enthalten. Nach dem Öffnen gut verschließen. Trotz mehrfacher Kontrollen können auch bei sorgfältiger Verpackung Fremdkörper (wie Schalenreste u. Ä.) nicht vollkommen vermieden werden. Trocken lagern. Vor Wärme schützen.
Studentenfutter
Weinbeeren* geölt 30 % (Weinbeeren*, Sonnenblumenöl*), Sultaninen* geölt 20 % (Sultaninen*, Sonnenblumenöl*), MANDELN* weiß 15 %, HASELNUSSKERNE* 14 %, CASHEWKERNE* 14 %, WALNUSSKERNE* 7% *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Erdnuss, anderen Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Studentenfutter or Studentenfutter?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Studentenfutter has fewer calories: 471 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Studentenfutter has less sugar: 29 g versus 34.4 g per 100 g.