S.pellegrino vs Magnetic Juice
Overall, S.pellegrino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | S.pellegrino | Magnetic Juice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 13 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- S.pellegrino has 93% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 13 kcal).
- S.pellegrino has no sugar, while Magnetic Juice has 2.7 g.
- S.pellegrino has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
S.pellegrino
eau minerale naturelle (99.3%), dyoxyde de carbone, arome naturel d'orange sanguine, arome naturel de framboise noire, avec autres aromes naturels
Magnetic Juice
Eau gazeifiée 81,5%, jus de 4 fruits à base de concentrés 17,2% (ananas 5,1%, mangue 5%, pomme 4,9%, citron 2,2%), sucre, arôme naturel, concentré (carotte, potiron), arôme naturel de mangue avec autres arômes naturels
FAQ
Which is healthier: S.pellegrino or Magnetic Juice?
Overall, S.pellegrino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
S.pellegrino has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 13 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
S.pellegrino has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.