Comparison
Special Blend vs Earl grey
Overall, Earl grey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Special Blend | Earl grey |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Special Blend
Thé noir, arôme de bergamote
Earl grey
95% zwarte thee, natuurlijk bergamot - en citroenaroma met andere natuurlijke aroma's.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Special Blend or Earl grey?
Overall, Earl grey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Earl grey has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Special Blend has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.