Sparkling Juice Beverage vs Turmeric Immune Support Juice Shot
Overall, Sparkling Juice Beverage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Sparkling Juice Beverage
Turmeric Immune Support Juice Shot
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sparkling Juice Beverage | Turmeric Immune Support Juic... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 7.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sparkling Juice Beverage has 19% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 35 kcal).
- Sparkling Juice Beverage has no fat, while Turmeric Immune Support Juice Shot has 0.4 g.
- Sparkling Juice Beverage has 20% less sugar (5.7 g vs 7.1 g).
- Turmeric Immune Support Juice Shot has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Turmeric Immune Support Juice Shot is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sparkling Juice Beverage
sparkling water, apple juice concentrate, strawberry juice concentrate, natural flavors, citric acid
Turmeric Immune Support Juice Shot
Apple Juice, Pineapple Juice, Lemon Juice, Red Pepper Juice, Ginger Root, TURMERIC ROOT (1.5%), Antioxidant. Ascorbic Acid; Ground Cayenne Pepper. DIETARY ADVICE: Suitable for vegans
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sparkling Juice Beverage or Turmeric Immune Support Juice Shot?
Overall, Sparkling Juice Beverage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sparkling Juice Beverage has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 35 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sparkling Juice Beverage has less sugar: 5.7 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.