Comparison

Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise vs Mangue-passion sauce framboise

Overall, Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSorbet plein fruit litchi fr...Mangue-passion sauce framboi...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 129 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 26 g 27.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.7 g 3 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.6 g
Additives03
AllergensEggs, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise has no saturated fat, while Mangue-passion sauce framboise has 0.3 g.
  • Only Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise lists: Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Mangue-passion sauce framboise lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise

Purée de framboise 31%, purée de litchi 23%, eau, sucre, dextrose, sirop de glucose, fibres végétales.

Mangue-passion sauce framboise

Sucre liquide, eau, purée de mangue 20,7 %, jus de fruit de la passion 18 %, purée de framboise 5,8 %, sucre, sirop de glucose de blé en poudre, gélifiant : pectines, jus de citron concentré, protéine de pois hydrolysée, épaississants (gomme xanthane, gomme guar), arôme naturel de framboise.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise or Mangue-passion sauce framboise?

Overall, Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mangue-passion sauce framboise has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sorbet plein fruit litchi framboise has less sugar: 26 g versus 27.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons