Comparison

Sorbet Framboise Bio vs Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml

Overall, Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSorbet Framboise BioSorbet plein fruit Framboise...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 134 kcal 125 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.1 g
Sugars 31 g 25 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1 g 7.5 g
Protein 0.3 g 0.8 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has 19% less sugar (25 g vs 31 g).
  • Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has 87% more fiber (7.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has 63% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sorbet Framboise Bio

Purée de framboise* 45%, eau, sucre de canne mi-blanc*, jus de citron*, gélifiant: pectines, arôme naturel de framboise. Peut contenir des traces de gluten, œuf, soja, lait, fruits à coque, sésame. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique

Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml

Framboise¹ 50 %, sucre, eau, fibres de maïs, fibres de pomme de terre, jus de citron, stabilisants (farine de graines de caroube, pectine), protéine de pomme de terre. ¹Origine U.E. ou hors UE

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sorbet Framboise Bio or Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml?

Overall, Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 134 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sorbet plein fruit Framboise 500G/750ml has less sugar: 25 g versus 31 g per 100 g.

More comparisons