Comparison

Sorbet fraise citron framboise vs Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis

Overall, Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSorbet fraise citron framboi...Sorbet Pomme Cassis Frambois...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 114 kcal 110 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 21 g 20.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.5 g
Additives22
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Sorbet fraise citron framboise

eau, sirops de glucose, purée de fraise, sucre, jus de citron à base de concentré, purée de framboise, stabilisants: méthylcellulose, gomme xanthane, arôme naturel de framboise, arôme naturel de fraise, concentré de betterave, concentré de carotte, arôme naturel de citron

Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis

Eau, sucre, purée de framboise (13%), purée de cassis sucrée (11,1%) (purée de cassis 90%, sucre), sirop de glucose ; jus de pomme à base de concentré (2,5%) ; gélifiants : farine de graines de caroube, pectine, carraghénares ; protéines de blé (_gluten_), sucre ; arôme naturel, colorant rouge de betterave.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sorbet fraise citron framboise or Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis?

Overall, Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sorbet Pomme Cassis Framboise Oasis has less sugar: 20.8 g versus 21 g per 100 g.

More comparisons