Sorbet citron vs Sorbet Citron de Sicile
Overall, Sorbet Citron de Sicile has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sorbet citron | Sorbet Citron de Sicile |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 119 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 22 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sorbet Citron de Sicile has 30% fewer calories (83 kcal vs 119 kcal).
- Sorbet Citron de Sicile has 27% less sugar (16 g vs 22 g).
- Sorbet citron has 38% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Sorbet citron
Eau, jus de citron à base de concentré 24%, sucre, sirop de glucose, gélifiants (pectines, gomme Tara, gomme xanthane), matière protéique de pois hydrolysée, arôme naturel de citron 0,06%. Peut contenir des traces de: gluten, œuf, soja, arachide, lait, fruits à coque
Sorbet Citron de Sicile
Eau, jus de citron à base de jus concentré (26%), sirop de glucose-fructose, sucre, écorces de citron, pulpe de citron, sirop de glucose, stabilisants (gomme guar, pectines, farine de graines de caroube, gomme Tara), protéines de pois hydrolysées, arôme naturel de citron avec autres arômes naturels, arôme naturel de citron. Peut contenir : lait.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sorbet citron or Sorbet Citron de Sicile?
Overall, Sorbet Citron de Sicile has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sorbet Citron de Sicile has fewer calories: 83 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sorbet Citron de Sicile has less sugar: 16 g versus 22 g per 100 g.