Comparison

Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g vs Chipster

Overall, Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSnacks pétales salés paquet...Chipster
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 507 kcal 472 kcal
Fat 28 g 20 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 9.2 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.7 g
Salt 1.6 g 3 g
Fiber 2.3 g 4 g
Protein 3.3 g 4.3 g
Additives01
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chipster has 29% less fat (20 g vs 28 g).
  • Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g has 71% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g has 47% less salt (1.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Chipster has 43% more fiber (4 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Chipster has 23% more protein (4.3 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Chipster lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g

Pomme de terre déshydratée 37%, amidon de pomme de terre, huile de tournesol 27%, sel 1,5%, curcuma et paprika déshydratés. traces éventuelles d'arachide, crustacés, céréales contenant du gluten et lait

Chipster

Flocons de pomme de terre 41%, fécule de pomme de terre 41 %, huile de palme, sel, antioxydant (extrait de romarin), curcuma 0,02 %. PEUT CONTENIR BLÉ, LAIT.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g or Chipster?

Overall, Snacks pétales salés paquet de 75g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chipster has fewer calories: 472 kcal versus 507 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chipster has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons