Comparison
Skyr vs Skyr nature 0%
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skyr | Skyr nature 0% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 57 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, LAIT, Ferments lactiques | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Skyr lists: LAIT, Ferments lactiques.
Ingredients
Skyr
LAIT écrémé, ferments lactiques (LAIT)
Skyr nature 0%
Lait écrémé - Lait concentré écrémé - Ferments lactiques.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skyr or Skyr nature 0%?
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr nature 0% has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Skyr nature 0% has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.